Snippets (law and crime): Difference between revisions

From Gnomon Chronicles
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Things to use or delete. See [[Snippets]].
Things to use or delete. See [[Snippets]].
== Embracery ==
Embracery is the attempt to influence a juror corruptly to give his or her verdict in favour of one side or the other in a trial, by promise, persuasions, entreaties, money, entertainments and the like.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embracery


== Anatole France ==
== Anatole France ==

Revision as of 10:59, 24 January 2019

Things to use or delete. See Snippets.

Embracery

Embracery is the attempt to influence a juror corruptly to give his or her verdict in favour of one side or the other in a trial, by promise, persuasions, entreaties, money, entertainments and the like.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embracery

Anatole France

The Law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor, to sleep under the bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

– Anatole France

Exhaustion of remedies

The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents a litigant from seeking a remedy in a new court or jurisdiction until all claims or remedies have been exhausted (pursued as fully as possible) in the original one. The doctrine was originally created by case law based on the principles of comity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exhaustion_of_remedies

Government Mind Control Documents

https://boingboing.net/2018/04/19/government-accidentally-sends.html

Twin Cities organized crime

Recursive Attorney Disorder

Recursive Attorney Disorder. (Not found in DSM. Actual disorder may differ from one shown. If you are an attorney, ask your attorney if Recursive Attorney Disorder is right for you.)

Jurisdictional or doctrinal

Jurisdictional or doctrinal?

Spam was nearly dead, then it became an essential tool for crime and came roaring back

Money Laundering and Art

Fair Use

  • Jeff Becker, an entertainment and intellectual property lawyer, said that fair use arguments rely on whether or not a piece of media is transformative or offers commentary on the original work — in this case real estate photos. He said the "satire-parody issue may be present" in the case of McMansion Hell, and that the blog "very well could fall within fair use."

Copyright