Possible has always been a possibility: Difference between revisions
From Gnomon Chronicles
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
=== Social media === | |||
* [https://twitter.com/GnomonChronicl1/status/1630206477062291458 Post] @ Twitter (27 February 2023) | * [https://twitter.com/GnomonChronicl1/status/1630206477062291458 Post] @ Twitter (27 February 2023) | ||
| Line 30: | Line 32: | ||
[[Category:Fiction (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:Fiction (nonfiction)]] | ||
{{Essays}} | |||
[[Category:COVID-19 (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:COVID-19 (nonfiction)]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:20, 14 January 2026
Context: "The big news, first thing, on "Way too Early", was a Mr. Gordon, from the WSJ. The Energy Dept now along w/the FBI (?) now won't deny that COVID could have been a lab leak. Much investigation going on but they call it "low confidence" but it's said "that" means "possible"."
Possible has always been a possibility.
It always could have been a lab leak.
It always could be a lab leak. (And always will be a growth medium for paranoid conspiracy theories.)
You can't prove a negative.
In the News
Fiction cross-reference
Nonfiction cross-reference
External links
Social media
- Post @ Twitter (27 February 2023)
