If-by-whiskey (nonfiction): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Nonfiction cross-reference == | == Nonfiction cross-reference == | ||
== Fiction cross-reference == | == Fiction cross-reference == | ||
| Line 21: | Line 19: | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If-by-whiskey If-by-whiskey] @ Wikipedia | * [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If-by-whiskey If-by-whiskey] @ Wikipedia | ||
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativist_fallacy Relativist fallacy]] @ Wikipedia | |||
[[Category:Nonfiction (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:Nonfiction (nonfiction)]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:23, 25 June 2016
In political discourse, if-by-whiskey is a relativist fallacy in which the speaker's position is contingent on the listener's opinion.
An if-by-whiskey argument implemented through doublespeak appears to affirm both sides of an issue, and agrees with whichever side the listener supports, in effect taking a position without taking a position.
The statement typically uses words with strongly negative or positive connotations (e.g., terrorist as negative and freedom fighter as positive).
In the News
Nonfiction cross-reference
Fiction cross-reference
- One if by Whiskey, Two if by God - film starring Gerard Butler.
External links:
- If-by-whiskey @ Wikipedia
- Relativist fallacy] @ Wikipedia