If-by-whiskey (nonfiction): Difference between revisions

From Gnomon Chronicles
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
In political discourse, '''if-by-whiskey''' is a [[relativist fallacy (nonfiction)]] in which the speaker's position is contingent on the listener's opinion.
In political discourse, '''if-by-whiskey''' is a [[relativist fallacy (nonfiction)|relativist fallacy]] in which the speaker's position is contingent on the listener's opinion.
 
== Description ==


An if-by-whiskey argument implemented through doublespeak appears to affirm both sides of an issue, and agrees with whichever side the listener supports, in effect taking a position without taking a position.
An if-by-whiskey argument implemented through doublespeak appears to affirm both sides of an issue, and agrees with whichever side the listener supports, in effect taking a position without taking a position.


The statement typically uses words with strongly negative or positive connotations (e.g., ''terrorist'' as negative and ''freedom fighter'' as positive).
The statement typically uses words with strongly negative or positive connotations (e.g., ''terrorist'' as negative and ''freedom fighter'' as positive).
== In the News ==
<gallery mode="traditional">
</gallery>


== Nonfiction cross-reference ==
== Nonfiction cross-reference ==
Line 14: Line 17:
== Fiction cross-reference ==
== Fiction cross-reference ==


* [[Gerard Butler]]
* [[One if by Whiskey, Two if by God]] - film starring [[Gerard Butler]].


== External links==
External links:


* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If-by-whiskey If-by-whiskey] @ Wikipedia
* [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If-by-whiskey If-by-whiskey] @ Wikipedia


[[Category:Nonfiction (nonfiction)]]
[[Category:Nonfiction (nonfiction)]]

Revision as of 11:22, 25 June 2016

In political discourse, if-by-whiskey is a relativist fallacy in which the speaker's position is contingent on the listener's opinion.

An if-by-whiskey argument implemented through doublespeak appears to affirm both sides of an issue, and agrees with whichever side the listener supports, in effect taking a position without taking a position.

The statement typically uses words with strongly negative or positive connotations (e.g., terrorist as negative and freedom fighter as positive).

In the News

Nonfiction cross-reference

Fiction cross-reference

External links: