No True Goldman: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman No true Scotsman] at Wikipedia. | See [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman No true Scotsman] at Wikipedia. | ||
== | == Source == | ||
Gnomon Chronicles [[School of Counter-Economics]]. | |||
== In the News == | == In the News == |
Revision as of 11:07, 21 June 2021
"No True Goldman", or appeal to purity, is an informal fallacy in which one attempts to protect their universal generalization from a falsifying counterexample by excluding the counterexample improperly.
Discussion
Rather than abandoning the falsified universal generalization or providing evidence that would disqualify the falsifying counterexample, a slightly modified generalization is constructed ad-hoc to definitionally exclude the undesirable specific case and counterexamples like it by appeal to rhetoric.
This rhetoric takes the form of emotionally charged but nonsubstantive purity platitudes such as "true, pure, genuine, authentic, real", etc.
Relationship with No True Scotsman fallacy
See No true Scotsman at Wikipedia.
Source
Gnomon Chronicles School of Counter-Economics.
In the News
Fiction cross-reference
- A true accounting of wealth in America
- Crimes against mathematical constants
- Gnomon algorithm
- Gnomon Chronicles
- Wealth
Nonfiction cross-reference
External links
- Post @ Twitter (21 June 2021)