Diary (February 22, 2020): Difference between revisions

From Gnomon Chronicles
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Online diary of [[Karl Jones (nonfiction)|Karl Jones]] for '''February 22, 2020'''.
Online diary of [[Karl Jones (nonfiction)|Karl Jones]] for '''February 22, 2020'''.


<small>Previous: [[Diary (June 14, 2020)]] - Next: [[Diary (June 16, 2020)]]</small>
<small>Previous: [[Diary (February 21, 2020)]] - Next: [[Diary (February 23, 2020)]]</small>


== Diary ==
== Diary ==
Line 21: Line 21:
* https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/kevin-kelly-discusses-fall-or-dodge-in-hell-with-author-neal-stephenson/163102/18
* https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/kevin-kelly-discusses-fall-or-dodge-in-hell-with-author-neal-stephenson/163102/18


User j9c replied:
Continued: [[Diary (February 23, 2020)]]
 
Yes, I had the same inkling.
 
Checklist for the text:
 
* lack of profanity
* lack of sex scenes (mostly, and when present, referred to obliquely)
* young protagonists
“ coming of age” theme
* lots of references to schools, teachers, lessons, classes, students, learning (calca), proofs, examinations
* ''adventures''
 
* [https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/kevin-kelly-discusses-fall-or-dodge-in-hell-with-author-neal-stephenson/163102/21 Comment] @ Boing Boing


== In the News ==
== In the News ==

Latest revision as of 19:44, 15 June 2020

Online diary of Karl Jones for February 22, 2020.

Previous: Diary (February 21, 2020) - Next: Diary (February 23, 2020)

Diary

Anathem

I sometimes wonder if Stephenson wrote Anathem specifically for bright young people.

The tip-off is the lack of obscenity. (Stephenson, of course, has a certain gift, or at least penchant, for obscenity.)

True, lack of obscenity is appropriate, given the protagonist’s character.

But then, none of the characters use obscenity anywhere in the novel, to speak of, nor does the narrative voice. (Several instances obscenity are handled in mild or clinical terms. These exceptions highlight the general rule.)

Furthermore, Stephenson chose to write in the Erasmasian mode. He could easily have slipped in plenty of funny dirty phrases and still given us Arbre. (The Slines should have belched obscenities non-stop, for starters.) But he didn’t. He scrubbed the dirt for this one.

So I’ll renew my surmise: Anathem was written for gifted young adults.

Continued: Diary (February 23, 2020)

In the News

Fiction cross-reference

Nonfiction cross-reference

External links