Eilenberg–Mazur swindle (nonfiction): Difference between revisions

From Gnomon Chronicles
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 27: Line 27:
* [[Samuel Eilenberg (nonfiction)]]
* [[Samuel Eilenberg (nonfiction)]]
* [[Geometric topology (nonfiction)]] - the study of manifolds and maps between them, particularly embeddings of one manifold into another.
* [[Geometric topology (nonfiction)]] - the study of manifolds and maps between them, particularly embeddings of one manifold into another.
* [[Grandi's series (nonfiction)]] - the infinite series 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ⋯, named after Italian mathematician, philosopher, and priest Guido Grandi, who gave a memorable treatment of the series in 1703. It is a divergent series, meaning that it lacks a sum in the usual sense. On the other hand, its Cesàro sum is 1/2.
* [[Mathematician (nonfiction)]]
* [[Mathematician (nonfiction)]]
* [[Mathematics (nonfiction)]]
* [[Mathematics (nonfiction)]]

Latest revision as of 06:52, 29 January 2020

In mathematics, the Eilenberg–Mazur swindle, named after Samuel Eilenberg and Barry Mazur, is a method of proof that involves paradoxical properties of infinite sums.

In geometric topology it was introduced by Mazur (1959, 1961) and is often called the Mazur swindle.

In algebra it was introduced by Samuel Eilenberg and is known as the Eilenberg swindle or Eilenberg telescope (see telescoping sum).

The Eilenberg–Mazur swindle is similar to the following well known joke "proof" that 1 = 0:

1 = 1 + (−1 + 1) + (−1 + 1) + ... = 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ... = (1 − 1) + (1 − 1) + ... = 0 This "proof" is not valid as a claim about real numbers because Grandi's series 1 − 1 + 1 − 1 + ... does not converge, but the analogous argument can be used in some contexts where there is some sort of "addition" defined on some objects for which infinite sums do make sense, to show that if A + B = 0 then A = B = 0.

In the News

Fiction cross-reference

Nonfiction cross-reference

External links: