Perpetual motion and time machines: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* [https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/remember-the-perpetual-motion-machine-called-orbo-they-are-back/68421/11 | * [https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/remember-the-perpetual-motion-machine-called-orbo-they-are-back/68421/11 Comment] @ Boing Boing | ||
* [https://bbs.boingboing.net/t/remember-the-perpetual-motion-machine-called-orbo-they-are-back/68421/2 It’s like a chemical reaction, but without the reacting chemicals.] @ Boing Boing | |||
[[Category:Fiction (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:Fiction (nonfiction)]] | ||
] | [[Category:To do (nonfiction)]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:16, 15 July 2019
Perpetual motion machines and time machines have one thing in common: Daddy Warbucks.
Consider:
- Perpetual Motion Machines are fictional.
- Daddy Warbucks is fictional.
- Daddy Warbucks would totally invest in a Perpetual Motion Machine.
- The photograph (TO_DO_PHOTO) clearly reveals a man who could possibly be Daddy Warbucks.
- Being fictional -- and this is critical -- Daddy Warbucks could appear anywhere.
And therefore:
- Perpetual Motion Machines are fictional -- just like Time Machines, which Daddy Warbucks would also totally invest in.
And it looks like Daddy Warbucks has invested in Time Machines -- why, just look at that youthful, vacant stare, hungering for a meaningful future ...!
Fiction cross reference
Nonfiction cross reference
External links
- Comment @ Boing Boing
- It’s like a chemical reaction, but without the reacting chemicals. @ Boing Boing