Political violence is likely to happen: Difference between revisions
(Created page with ""'''Political violence is likely to happen'''" is a short essay by Karl Jones. == Political violence is likely to happen == <blockquote> Shine a...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* [[Gnomon algorithm]] | * [[Gnomon algorithm]] | ||
* [[Gnomon Chronicles]] | * [[Gnomon Chronicles]] | ||
* [[What's going to happen is new countries]] | |||
== Nonfiction cross-reference == | == Nonfiction cross-reference == | ||
| Line 33: | Line 34: | ||
== External links == | == External links == | ||
* [ Comment] @ Facebook | * [https://www.facebook.com/karl.gregory.jones/posts/10225326585690233 Comment] @ Facebook | ||
[[Category:Fiction (nonfiction)]] | [[Category:Fiction (nonfiction)]] | ||
[[Category:Essays | [[Category:Essays]] | ||
Latest revision as of 07:48, 4 February 2023
"Political violence is likely to happen" is a short essay by Karl Jones.
Political violence is likely to happen
Shine a not-so-different light on this, and you get my view—
"Political violence is likely to happen."
To my thinking, this is my liberal-intellectual cognate of the "4 in 10 Republicans Say Political Violence May Be Necessary."
Strip out "necessary", which implies human decision in the face of determinism, and replace it with simple determinism:
Political violence is likely to happen.
We are mathematicians, you and I, so I remind not you but others that the phrase "4 in 10 Republicans Say Political Violence May Be Necessary" is better understood as "Pollsters asked questions of some Republicans and interpreted it as '4 in 10 Republicans...""
Statistical analysis is not necessarily *wrong* — but it is necessarily *propaganda*.
In the News
Fiction cross-reference
Nonfiction cross-reference
External links
- Comment @ Facebook